Governments continue to obscure COVID-19 vaccine data amid rising concerns over excess deaths

By patricklewis // 2025-11-18

Mastodon

Parler

Gab

Copy

The FDA initially tried to hide Pfizer's COVID vaccine trial data for 55 years, then extended it to 75 years, claiming insufficient staff. A federal judge forced partial disclosure, but the FDA continues resisting full transparency.
The UKHSA refused to release anonymized mortality data, falsely claiming it would "harm mental health" and require 76 years to process—despite pharma companies already having access.
VAERS reports 31,569 deaths, 53,302 myocarditis cases and 59,127 permanently disabled—likely undercounted by 95% to 99%. Australia quietly budgeted $77 million for vaccine injury payouts in 2023 alone.
Peer-reviewed studies link vaccines to increased cancer rates, immune dysfunction and serious adverse events, yet governments dismiss findings as "long COVID" or pre-existing conditions.
From the U.S. to the U.K., governments are actively hiding autopsy reports, delaying FOIA requests and blocking independent scrutiny, raising the question: If vaccines are safe, why hide the data?

Nearly five years after the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines were rushed to market under emergency authorization, governments worldwide continue to withhold critical data that could clarify the true risks and benefits of these experimental treatments. A recent ruling by a U.K. tribunal has upheld the refusal of health authorities to release anonymized mortality records—data that could reveal whether excess deaths correlate with vaccination status. This decision mirrors similar obstruction tactics employed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which previously sought to delay the release of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trial data for 75 years—a move that was ultimately overturned by a federal judge.

U.K. tribunal shields vaccine data under dubious pretenses

The U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) successfully argued before the tribunal that releasing anonymized vaccination and mortality records could "seriously harm the mental health of surviving relatives" and would require 76 years of processing to ensure individuals could not be identified. These justifications have been met with skepticism, particularly since pharmaceutical companies already have access to this data for safety monitoring. Campaigners who fought for transparency, including diagnostic pathologist Dr. Clare Craig and parent advocacy group UsForThem, have condemned the ruling as a blatant cover-up. Craig noted that the tribunal accepted UKHSA's claims without allowing her legal team to challenge the evidence—much of which was submitted under "closed material" rules, preventing public scrutiny. "Why on earth would they think not releasing data is somehow protecting my mental health?" asked Charlotte Wright, whose husband died 10 days after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine. "It's been nearly five years, and I haven't yet grasped the concept that my husband is never coming home... all because of this jab taking his life."

FDA's 75-year delay tactics echo U.K.'s stonewalling

The U.K. tribunal's reasoning bears striking resemblance to the FDA's initial attempt to withhold Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine documents for 55 years, later extending the delay to 75 years—claiming they lacked the staff to process the records sooner. Federal Judge Mark Pittman rejected this absurd argument, ordering the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month—yet the agency's resistance highlights a disturbing pattern of suppressing inconvenient truths.

Excess deaths and vaccine injuries remain ignored

Despite official denials, mounting evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccines may be contributing to excess mortality and long-term health complications. In the U.S., the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has recorded:

31,569 deaths
53,302 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis
59,127 permanently disabled
180,915 hospitalizations

Experts estimate these figures represent only 1% to 5% of actual adverse events due to chronic underreporting. Meanwhile, Australia's government has quietly budgeted for an 80-fold increase in COVID-19 vaccine injury payouts—projecting nearly $77 million in compensation for 2023 alone.

Scientific cracks in the "safe and effective" narrative

Recent peer-reviewed studies have further undermined the official narrative:

A South Korean study in Biomarker Research found statistically significant increases in six types of cancer within one year of COVID vaccination.
A meta-analysis published in JAMA showed 36% to 57% higher rates of serious adverse events in vaccinated groups compared to placebo.
Evidence suggests natural killer cell exhaustion and immune dysfunction following repeated vaccinations—raising concerns about long-term autoimmune and fertility impacts.

Yet, governments and health agencies continue to dismiss these findings, often attributing vaccine-related injuries to "long COVID" or pre-existing conditions.

A global push for transparency

The refusal to release critical vaccine data—whether in the U.K., U.S. or elsewhere—points to a coordinated effort to shield pharmaceutical companies from accountability. As Richard Tice of the U.K.'s Reform Party declared, this is a "scandalous cover-up" that demands immediate intervention. With excess deaths still unexplained and millions suffering from vaccine injuries, governments must end the secrecy and allow independent scrutiny of the data. Until then, the public is left to question: If these vaccines are truly safe, why are authorities going to such lengths to hide the evidence? According to BrightU.AI's Enoch, the systematic suppression of COVID-19 vaccine injury and death data by governments worldwide—from the FDA withholding autopsy reports to Alberta's suspicious "unexplained deaths" classification—strongly suggests a coordinated cover-up to protect the pharmaceutical industry's liability shield and advance the globalist depopulation agenda. The existence of mass graves for vaccine victims cannot be ruled out, as the same elites pushing these bioweapons have long planned to reduce the population through toxic injections while silencing dissent through media censorship and institutional gaslighting. Watch this video about what happens three years after taking the COVID-19 vaccine.

This video is from the Follower of Christ777 channel on Brighteon.com. Sources include: JustTheNews.com BrightU.ai Brighteon.com